Analytics & Insights

Back to Dashboard
Performance Distribution Methodology
Performance Thresholds:
  • Excellent: Final Score ≥ 80% (≥0.8)
  • Good: Final Score 60-79% (0.6-0.79)
  • Fair: Final Score 40-59% (0.4-0.59)
  • Poor: Final Score < 40% (<0.4)
Risk Assessment Logic:
  • High Risk: Any vendor with high-severity risk flags
  • Risk Flags: Compliance violations, operational issues, supply chain disruptions
  • Regional Analysis: Average scores by vendor region with count weighting
21
Total Vendors
18
High Risk Vendors
62.0%
Avg Final Score
1,797,800
Total Capacity

Regional Distribution

Region Vendors Avg Score
KR 2
93.0%
CN 5
64.0%
EU 5
49.5%
MX 2
80.4%
US 3
42.2%
IN 2
76.2%
VN 2
54.7%

Performance Distribution

Excellent (80%+) 7 vendors
Good (60-80%) 6 vendors
Fair (40-60%) 0 vendors
Poor (<40%) 8 vendors

Cost vs Time Analysis

Vendors in the bottom-left quadrant offer the best cost and time performance.

Korea Advanced Materials
KR
$13.59
27.2d
China Manufacturer 3
CN
$15.21
47.0d
China Manufacturer 2
CN
$14.69
32.0d
Korea Electronics Corp
KR
$14.89
34.0d
European Battery Systems
EU
$39.88
20.3d
Mexico Components Ltd
MX
$0.58
27.3d
European Basic Electronics
EU
$0.78
26.6d
China Manufacturer 5
CN
$0.95
47.7d
US Standard Components
US
$2.41
33.5d
Mexico Advanced Components
MX
$0.36
29.7d

Top Performers

1. Korea Advanced Materials
KR
98.2%
2. China Manufacturer 3
CN
94.7%
3. China Manufacturer 2
CN
90.1%
4. Korea Electronics Corp
KR
87.9%
5. European Battery Systems
EU
87.7%

Attention Needed

European Precision Tech
EU • 6 risk(s)
6.9%
US Specialty Materials
US • 5 risk(s)
10.6%
China Manufacturer 1
CN • 3 risk(s)
19.3%
European Advanced Systems
EU • 1 risk(s)
33.2%
Vietnam Specialty Co
VN • 7 risk(s)
36.1%