Vendor Dashboard
Executive Summary
• Top Performer: Korea Advanced Materials leads with 98.2% score
• Risk Alert: 18/21 vendors flagged with high-risk issues
• Cost Efficiency: Top performers average 10%+ lower costs ($14.50 vs $86.08)
• Supply Capacity: 1,797,800 total units/month across all vendors
• Data Quality: 21/21 vendors need data refresh
Recommendation: Competitive Landscape: Consider diversified sourcing between Korea Advanced Materials and China Manufacturer 3 to balance performance and risk.
Scoring Methodology
Final Score Formula:
Final Score = (Cost Score × Cost Weight) + (Time Score × Time Weight) + (Vendor Maturity Score × Maturity Weight) + (Capacity Score × Capacity Weight)
Current Weights:
Cost 40.0%,
Time 30.0%,
Maturity 20.0%,
Capacity 10.0%
Cost Score
- Input: Average total landed cost per part
- Formula: unit_price + freight_cost + (unit_price × tariff_rate)
- Scaling: Min-max normalized (inverted - lower cost = higher score)
Time Score
- Input: Average total time to delivery
- Formula: (lead_time_weeks × 7) + transit_days
- Scaling: Min-max normalized (inverted - shorter time = higher score)
Vendor Maturity Score
- 5-Dimensional Assessment:
- • Operational Excellence (35%): OTIF, consistency, quality
- • Financial Maturity (25%): stability, debt management
- • Innovation & Tech (20%): digital transformation, R&D
- • Business Maturity (15%): age, size, experience
- • Partnership (5%): communication, improvement
- Scaling: Min-max normalized across portfolio
Capacity Score
- Input: Total monthly capacity across all parts
- Purpose: Indicates ability to meet demand volumes
- Scaling: Min-max normalized (higher capacity = higher score)
Key Insight:
Vendor Maturity accounts for 20.0% of the final score and uses comprehensive business metrics beyond simple reliability measures.
View complete methodology